Friday, July 29, 2016

When did the truth go out of style?



When I was a young man news was published in the daily newspaper.  Local news was investigated and written up by local reporters and proofed by the editor.  National news was provided on a teletype machine from the Associated Press (AP) and United Press International (UPI).  It was an article of faith that what was printed was true and unbiased.  At least everyone believed that and I suppose perception is everything.  I still think it was nearly always true and a newsman’s reputation for truth and fairness was his most important possession.  I was in the broadcast news business briefly in 1968 and at that time it was just as reputable as the newspaper. 
 Now anyone can get published just like this post.  No one screens it, I can spout truth or total nonsense and the chances are it will be about equally believed.  If I say something like “Congressmen can retire after 4 years on 100% salary” a sizeable percentage will believe it – especially if you are already anti government.  I’m pretty anti government these days myself, but I have a major respect for the truth that doesn’t allow me to publish nonsense.  So what am I getting at?  I think I may have just hit on what is wrong with the current political climate.  There is no source for facts and truth.  Or at least there is no easy way to separate fact from fiction.  Look at the sheer nonsense being published by the political parties during this run up to the November elections.  This is actually an important election, but are they offering real concrete solutions to the problems that the politicians have made in the first place?  Not that I can find. 
            So far as I can tell, the democrats (who have an actual current track record) are doing nothing but attacking the character and/or personality of the Republican candidate.  If I find an actual plan from them I’ll post it later.  The Republicans, or at least their candidate, have identified the problems we all care about.  I’m talking about terrorism, border control, international trade and many more serious issues but if they have offered a concrete plan to fix any of them it was lost on me.  Oh, I forgot about the wall idea.  At least it’s a ‘concrete’ idea.  (Sorry, I couldn’t resist)  Terrorism, hmm I guess that’s what TSA and homeland security or about.  They claim it’s working.  Many years ago I saw a beatnik (remember them?) on a street corner in NYC just standing there and snapping his fingers.  I asked him what he was doing and he said: “I’m keeping the wild elephants away.”  I said there’s not a wild elephant within 10,000 miles.  He said, “Works great doesn’t it?”  
          As for international trade, the solution is both simple and obvious.  We must make the playing field level.  American factories can produce goods as cheap as any after you adjust for shipping.  If a trading partner wants to sell a product for 50% of what it costs to produce we simply add the other 50% in customs and use that money to subsidize our own factories.  It wouldn’t take long for that to fix the problem. 
            Let’s forget this political correctness nonsense and stop immigration from Moslem countries.  In WW II we actually locked up entire Japanese families for the protection of the public at large.  Can you imagine that happening in the current climate?  If only 1% of Moslems are terrorists that means that 10 terrorists get in with each 1000 immigrants.  We just can’t afford that.  We don’t owe the rest of the world a living.  Hell, we don’t even owe our own citizens a living if they don’t want to work for it. 
            That’s how I see it.

Thursday, July 21, 2016

The end of the two party system?



            Will the last Republican leaving the party please turn out the lights?  Are we seeing the end of the American two party system?  If so, is it past due?  Several elections ago the Tea Party achieved considerable success by offering a conservative alternative to the mainstream Republican party that many long standing republicans simply didn't feel represented their interests.  And yet, the party central committees just don't seem to see the handwriting on the wall.  The party "leadership" fought Donald Trump right down to the wire even though he was the landslide leader with the public. 
            With clear evidence that the public is fed up with politics as usual look at what the Democrats came up with.  The ultimate party insider was their only candidate from the outset.  In order to get maximum press coverage they had to have a straw dog for the debates and they couldn't produce a single Democrat willing to be the designated loser.  So they came up with an avowed socialist to have a sparring partner and he got a phenomenal amount of votes!  In fact he got about 12 million votes to her 15.5 million.  Think about it.  Among Blacks, she won 75.9% to 23.1%!  Among Whites she actually lost 48.9% to 49.1%.  Keep in mind that Blacks make up about 11% of the population and whites about 80%.
            So what does that all add up to?  Well, the Democrats appear to be oblivious (or uncaring) to what the public wants.  I suppose they may change their approach between now and the election, but I don't see how they can sell Hillary Clinton to the public as anything but more of the same.  I think it's too late to come up with another candidate at this point.  The Republicans are in a somewhat different situation.  They have a highly controversial candidate that is as far as possible from mainstream politics.  But--- they have taken too long to get behind an outsider.  It appears to me that voters who like Donald Trump don't like the Republican party leadership and the party leadership doesn't like Donald Trump.
             I don't see either party surviving this general election in a recognizable format.  The Republicans don't appear able to get their house in order so I foresee a major split into two parties - probably Tea Party and mainstream republicans.  The Democrats I see as just growing into a smaller party.  The Blue Dog Dems could easily join with the Tea Party to form a third conservative party.  If that actually happened we could easily wind up with a three party system and that might be exactly what we need. 
            That's how I see it.